Street musicians
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
Thursday, 22 November 2012
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
Fascinating discussion
Saturday, 27 October 2012
Tuesday, 23 October 2012
Don't like movies much but love films! :-)
My answer (as it seems I'm unable to put in on that "Libraries at the Movies" blog):
Film not great and with mistakes? I found it pretty good, and yes perhaps many mistakes but there are also mistakes in the book... if I was able to detect one (a gregorian chant on the wrong day) there must be several others...
The motto of Oxford is "Dieu m'illumine" (in Latin, sorry I do not know this language), surely it is not: "grumpy always" in Cambridge? I don't understand why one has do to negative reviews, surely one must think positive? (I always do when I write reviews
http://www.dailyinfo.co.uk/search/reviews.php?user_id=23834)
And perhaps also write outside planet Hollywood films? You know, films that are sometimes not in English? There are many portraitures of librarians there, and many of them positive.
Lucile
Ouch... when I read "Umberto Eco's first novel tranformed a relatively obscure Italian professor of semiotics into an international poststructuralist superstar. Unlike Derrida, here was a European prof whose books you could actually read. Unlike Foucault, he didn't say awkward things about madness, imprisonment and sex, and unlike Deleuze his name was easy to pronounce and his ideas weren't so obviously loony." but hopefully this is humour from your part... hopefully. (in case not, do read the beautiful and moving book from my friend Joe
http://www.oxfordparis.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/seeing-invisible-kai-mansberger.html which uses a lot of Foucault's ideas and I can tell you from my own experience in psychiatric hospital that yes, some of what Foucault said -that is the Foucault I managed to understand!- is very true)
Saturday, 13 October 2012
Tuesday, 9 October 2012
First book of poetry!
It is published by my friends Alison and Paul, proud owners of Strawberry Press
Several poems of mine, in English, all printed by hand (mine! Pfew! That was something!), with a wood-engraving from one of my Dad's drawings :-)
Sunday, 23 September 2012
Papa's art stuff
Papa, like many autodidacts I know who never made it to high-school, has read extensively, and you can find many references to world litterature, such as
Don Quichotte de la Mancha, a book he's very fond of,
or the Greek mythology,here it is the passage of the Styx, the river between life and death, with the "lovely" Charon in charge, described by Lucian (I think, though let me know if I'm wrong! But I remember studying a text in Greek class that my father read, and here is the result!). You can see also on that one, especially with Charon's head, Japanese influence.
Dad's always been very fond of the art of Japanese printmaking: Okusai in particular but many others and I'm sorry I do not have my Dad's culture and do not know many names!
The Greeks again or rather the people living in Crete, and a smidgen of Picasso I suppose.
For my book, of course, there won't be any images of hell, or fantastic landscapes, there will only be... well I don't know yet, but very probably a real landscape (si tant est que cela veuille dire quelque chose!) or clouds
Thursday, 6 September 2012
Sunday, 26 August 2012
Dear Readers
Saturday, 11 August 2012
Thursday, 26 July 2012
Friday, 20 July 2012
Je ne suis pas un ange
Je suis tombée
Dans le dos la brûlure
J'ai vécu en jouant
du violon ou de la trompette
Certains m'ont dit là bas
avec un trémolo dans la voix
"Ah! Votre manière de jouer Brahms!"
Ou peut être étais-je celle qui jouait
les préludes de Bach au violoncelle
devant le four qui se remplissait
J'ai vécu
Dans le dos la brûlure
J'erre dans les temps
Je pleure beaucoup
Les innocents brûlent toujours
Thursday, 19 July 2012
Roasting
I feel very Spanish today
roasting in the sun waiting
for a bus that does not come
I try not to show fear
when I walked on the road
the dynosaurs are passing by
as long as I am not in their way.
How long have I waited now?
One hour maybe? Not cigarettes left.
I'll be cranky. Americans are passing by,
doing their hobbies, dressed up to "work out"
Oh I'm working it out just fine here.
Wednesday, 11 July 2012
In the country
In the country of my ancestors
I feel nothing but difference
Maybe I should be like those surfers
Looking at our lands with indifference
Tuesday, 3 July 2012
Please sign this petition!
(more information on the BBC News website)
Friday, 8 June 2012
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
Sunday, 27 May 2012
Tuesday, 22 May 2012
Thursday, 17 May 2012
Sunday, 6 May 2012
#radiolondres
Friday, 4 May 2012
Thursday, 3 May 2012
Friday, 20 April 2012
Lettre envoyée à une journaliste (?) du Monde
Madame,
Votre article m’a beaucoup déçu. Je suis d’accord pour dire qu’il y a de la propagande sur Russia Today et plus que sur d’autres chaînes de télévision c’est vrai, mais seulement c’était une bonne chaîne pour regarder les élections russes avec beaucoup d’invités en table ronde, des universitaires du monde entier, on se serait cru sur ARTE. Quelquefois d’autres chaînes de télévision déçoivent, comme par exemple la BBC -je dois avouer que c’est bien rare mais il faut comprendre qu’il y a toujours la guerre froide et qu’un programme comme « Poutin and the West » à la BBC ne parlait pas évidemment des actions de la CIA dans les anciens territoires soviétiques, comme la Georgie ou l’Ukraine (je me trompe peut-être ceci dit je suis sûre que la CIA a eu un rôle à jouer dans la naissance de ces nations). La BBC, très bonne d’habitude, ne pouvait pas parler de cela, puisque la Grande Bretagne est trop liée avec les Etats-Unis d’Amérique.
Il y a de la propagande partout… surtout lorsqu’on parle de la Russie, par exemple on a souvent plus parlé des manifestations avec rubans blancs (contre Poutine) que des manifestations qui se passaient en même temps pro-Poutine (Le Guardian n’a pas été très fort là-dessus). Je peux comprendre la méfiance de Poutine vis-à-vis de l’Ouest.
Je vous conseille peut-être d’apprendre les langues étrangères, comme cela vous seriez en mesure de lire le monde, le vrai !
http://www.netvibes.com/languagelibrary#General
(les Russes aussi sont extrèmement actifs sur la Toile, faîtes des recherches, l’un des meilleurs moteurs de recherche étant http://www.yandex.ru/ )
Je ne vous salue pas Madame,
Lucile
Lettres envoyée à une journaliste (?) du Monde
Madame,
Votre article m’a beaucoup déçu. Je suis d’accord pour dire qu’il y a de la propagande sur RT et plus que sur d’autres chaînes de télévisions c’est vrai, mais seulement c’était une bonne chaîne pour regarder les élections russes avec beaucoup d’invités en table ronde, des universitaires du monde entier, on se serait cru sur ARTE. Quelquefois d’autres chaînes de télévision déçoivent, comme par exemple la BBC -je dois avouer que c’est bien rare mais il faut comprendre qu’il y a toujours la guerre froide et qu’un programme comme « Poutin and the West » à la BBC ne parlait pas évidemment des actions de la CIA dans les anciens territoires soviétiques, comme la Georgie ou l’Ukraine (je me trompe peut-être ceci dit je suis sûre que la CIA a eu un rôle à jouer dans la naissance de ces nations). La BBC, très bonne d’habitude, ne pouvait pas parler de cela, puisque la Grande Bretagne est trop liée avec les Etats-Unis d’Amérique.
Il y a de la propagande partout… surtout lorsqu’on parle de la Russie, par exemple on a souvent plus parlé des manifestations avec rubans blancs (contre Poutine) que des manifestations qui se passaient en même temps pro-Poutine (Le Guardian n’a pas été très fort là-dessus). Je peux comprendre la méfiance de Poutine vis-à-vis de l’Ouest.
Je vous conseille peut-être d’apprendre les langues étrangères, comme cela vous seriez en mesure de lire le monde, le vrai !
http://www.netvibes.com/languagelibrary#General
(les Russes aussi sont extrèmement actifs sur la Toile, faîtes des recherches, l’un des meilleurs moteurs de recherche étant http://www.yandex.ru/ )
Je ne vous salue pas Madame,
Lucile
Thursday, 12 April 2012
on education (and getting lost in what I want to say)
This lecture dates from 1959, a while ago, I would perhaps argue that it is even worse today, probably there is a bigger gap between scientists themselves given the advance of many different fields of knowledge, and same for the writers, this can be reflected perhaps even in France: twenty years ago, you had two main baccalaureat, the scientific one, the literary one, now you have three: the scientific, the literary, and economical and social sciences ...today, if you study film studies or sociology, would you understand a classicist much? And I would go further, if you do a PhD, you do not necessarily know much else other than your subject. I went to a music conference once, and I was horrified at the lack of general knowledge of some of the speakers who had been so heavily involved in their subject that they knew nothing of the next door subjects, but perhaps I have been lucky enough to have received some general music education at the Paris Conservatoire (history of music).
There is the dream of course of being a Pantagruel, an ogre of knowledge, who makes sure his son, Gargantua, gets an education, and that meant, in the humanist sense of the term:
religion, astronomy, philosophy, sport, biology, arithmetic and reading books in the original: Greek, Latin, Hebrew, and quite a few others, as the letter from Pantagruel to Gargantua illustrates:
« l'entenz et veulx que tu apprenes les langues parfaictement : premièrement la grecque, comme le veut Quintilien ; secondement la latine, et puis l'hebraicque pour les sainctes lettres, et la chaldaicque et arabicque pareillement. Puis soigneusement reuisite les livres des medicins grecz, arabes et latins, sans contemner les thalmudistes et cabalistes. »
An extract, in French, illustrates also the spirit of the learning, which is a happy spirit.
Learning a lot is great, and I can see, living and working at Oxford University, the best of students enjoying their time in my place of work, just for the pleasure to learn something more than their "usual" studies at Oxford. But how many people are being stuffed with knowledge without pleasure? (if they are being stuffed with knowledge that is!)
I met an old friend yesterday, he's a French primary school teacher in Danmark, he said to me, his key point is to teach the kids how to be happy. How to be happpy. That's all. He then explained that in Danmark, most people have a decent salary, even if they have not made long studies. He's against giving marks, against a society that encourages ferocious competition... but we cannot do much about this I'm afraid, the elite will always be made of people who went to the good institutions and most of them will also have had an education at home (I cannot claim I am part of the elite, and I spent most of my studies sleeping at the end of the class, but at least I was in good schools, and both my parents were interested in art, literature and films), all of this helps and one cannot expect kids, living in deprivate areas -with sometimes parents who do not even speak the language of the country well- to do so well in school where, anyway, it is sometimes -if not all the time- a challenge to hear the teacher. Perhaps, and it was a point made by many librarians at Oxford in a survey, it is now important for the elite not to be elitiste.
There are some efforts being made, Oxford and Cambridge get regularly attacked by the media for not including enough kids from non-public schools and they really do try their best. In France, la cour des comptes just released a report about the geographical inequality of spendings between schools; monsieur Sollers, on French television, defends the study of the "classics", how important it is to know Latin and Greek; in Germany, Latin is still a language that can be taught in school from the age of 11 (at least in Swabia where I was last week) and in Russia and Ukraine... well I cannot speak about those countries much but the few Russians and Ukrainians I have done a language exchange with were mostly scientists and were all reading literature books and loving poetry and learning other languages, on top of learning English that is...(the other Russian speaking friends I have are doing theology so language learning is de rigueur for them: Old Slavonic, Hebrew, Latin, Greek, German, French, English, Modern Hebrew... but one must remember that theology, "speaking of God" was the highest of all knowledge in medieval times and that one couldn't start learning this field without having a previous degree in another field... do please correct me if I am wrong there!) Languages, at least the living ones, and especially English, are pretty much on the agenda on the "continent" as the British call our lands and in many other countries... in Great Britain, this is another matter. Shame really, because the European Union is craving for British graduates with multilingual skills.
If we were to live in a perfect world, yes, it would be great to get an equivalent of the baccalauréat (or as whatever people want to call it) in most countries, which would mean that all high school students would study as many discipline as possible till the age of 18. As for the joy of learning... hm... I have had teachers who made me want to learn, but others who kept me asleep in my corner and a big part of my education has come from my surroundings, not a suburb, but Paris, difficult then not to go out and see exhibitions, concerts, films etc... and make friends, speak with them, learn from them... a Russian short-story goes even further (I'm sorry I do not remember who wrote that) with this woman, in an hotel, educating herself with the men she sleeps with... I have to admit one of the most cultured people I met where working in la FNAC, were autodidacts or people who had gone to the "professional baccalauréat" as we used to call them then. They would get a better pay in Danmark I suppose...
Derrida, I think, wrote some interesting things about the education of the future, if I recall it well, there was an interview with him in les Inrock : the university of the future will change dramatically (I must read more on that sorry, in particular L'Université sans condition).
"La culture, c'est ce qui reste quand on a tout oublié"... Sagan is right, and the more disciplines you learn the better it is... but Sagan is wrong too, la culture, and la connaissance, should be, for those interested, a perpetual need and thirst of knowledge. Perhaps also this links with the "learning society" we are in (and in which librarians, and many other chartered professions, need to continuously upgrade their knowledge) but I very very much hope one learns for the pleasure and enlightenment of learning rather than just for money.