Libraries at the Movies: 'No one should be forbidden to consult these books...:
The monastery librarian. For some reason, books are always returned by
their due date The Name of the Rose (1986) What's it about? ...
My answer (as it seems I'm unable to put in on that "Libraries at the Movies" blog):
Film not great and with mistakes? I found it pretty good, and yes
perhaps many mistakes but there are also mistakes in the book... if I
was able to detect one (a gregorian chant on the wrong day) there must
be several others...
The motto of Oxford is "Dieu m'illumine" (in
Latin, sorry I do not know this language), surely it is not: "grumpy
always" in Cambridge? I don't understand why one has do to negative
reviews, surely one must think positive? (I always do when I write
reviews
http://www.dailyinfo.co.uk/search/reviews.php?user_id=23834)
And
perhaps also write outside planet Hollywood films? You know, films that
are sometimes not in English? There are many portraitures of librarians
there, and many of them positive.
Lucile
Ouch... when I
read "Umberto Eco's first novel tranformed a relatively obscure Italian
professor of semiotics into an international poststructuralist
superstar. Unlike Derrida, here was a European prof whose books you
could actually read. Unlike Foucault, he didn't say awkward things about
madness, imprisonment and sex, and unlike Deleuze his name was easy to
pronounce and his ideas weren't so obviously loony." but hopefully this
is humour from your part... hopefully. (in case not, do read the
beautiful and moving book from my friend Joe
http://www.oxfordparis.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/seeing-invisible-kai-mansberger.html
which uses a lot of Foucault's ideas and I can tell you from my own
experience in psychiatric hospital that yes, some of what Foucault said
-that is the Foucault I managed to understand!- is very true)